Comparaison de techniques de débruitage des images scintigraphiques Comparison of denoising techniques of scintigraphic images

Scintigraphic images are strongly affected by Poisson noise. This article presents the results of a comparison between denoising methods for Poisson noise according to different criteria: the gain in signal-to-noise ratio, the preservation of resolution and contrast, and the visual quality. The wavelet techniques recently developed to denoise Poisson noise limited images are divided into two groups based on: (1) the Haar representation, (2) the transformation of Poisson noise into white Gaussian noise by the Haar–Fisz transform followed by a denoising. In this study, three variants of the first group and three variants of the second, including the adaptative Wiener filter, four types of wavelet thresholdings and the Bayesian method of Pizurica were compared to Metz and Hanning filters and to Shine, a systematic noise elimination process. All these methods, except Shine, are parametric. For each of them, ranges of optimal values for the parameters were highlighted as a function of the aforementioned criteria. The intersection of ranges for the wavelet methods without thresholding was empty, and these methods were therefore not further compared quantitatively. The thresholding techniques and Shine gave the best results in resolution and contrast. The largest improvement in signal-to-noise ratio was obtained by the filters. Ideally, these filters should be accurately defined for each image. This is difficult in the clinical context. Moreover, they generate oscillation artefacts. In addition, the wavelet techniques did not bring significant improvements, and are rather slow. Therefore, Shine, which is fast and works automatically, appears to be an interesting alternative. # 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Mots clés : Scintigraphie ; Réduction de bruit ; Filtres ; Ondelettes ; Shine